Genre pictures, well, at least certain genres.
I have to admit that this is based on not so much research, but more on what my gut is telling me. And what my gut is saying is, I think the Oscars are biased toward certain genres, and more importantly, against others. After all, if you look at it a certain way, drama is a genre, and dramas win lots of Oscars. Then again, me, I don't really consider drama to be a particular genre. It's more like drama is the baseline, and the other genres are what depart from that. However, some genres do fare well at the Oscars; war movies, histories, epics, and to a lesser degree comedies, have all done pretty well over the years. Other genres, not so much.
So when I say genre pictures, I mean Westerns, Science Fiction, Film Noir, etc. And it seems to me that that these genres not just win, but tend to dominate certain technical categories, visual effects, production design, makeup, and sound editing. However, if they are nominated in one of the big categories, Best Picture, any of the acting categories, Best Director, or screenplay, they rarely win. Just a nomination is honor enough for these films. It makes me think that maybe the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has a 13½ inch 8½ pound statuette up their collective butts, which in comparison to a stick of similar size, I'd probably go with the statue too.
I have to admit that this is based on not so much research, but more on what my gut is telling me. And what my gut is saying is, I think the Oscars are biased toward certain genres, and more importantly, against others. After all, if you look at it a certain way, drama is a genre, and dramas win lots of Oscars. Then again, me, I don't really consider drama to be a particular genre. It's more like drama is the baseline, and the other genres are what depart from that. However, some genres do fare well at the Oscars; war movies, histories, epics, and to a lesser degree comedies, have all done pretty well over the years. Other genres, not so much.
So when I say genre pictures, I mean Westerns, Science Fiction, Film Noir, etc. And it seems to me that that these genres not just win, but tend to dominate certain technical categories, visual effects, production design, makeup, and sound editing. However, if they are nominated in one of the big categories, Best Picture, any of the acting categories, Best Director, or screenplay, they rarely win. Just a nomination is honor enough for these films. It makes me think that maybe the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has a 13½ inch 8½ pound statuette up their collective butts, which in comparison to a stick of similar size, I'd probably go with the statue too.
Anyway, I thought the best way to approach this was to use examples of specific films from the seven genres I feel are particularly neglected to demonstrate (one primary film and one honorable mention). My first thought was to limit it to pictures that didn't get any nominations at all. But that was way too restrictive. I decided it was better to concentrate on great movies that may or may not have been nominated but didn't win a single Academy Award.
King Kong (1933) received no Oscar nominations. Executive Producer David O. Seznik suggested to that Motion Picture Academy that a special award in visual effects (none existed at the time) be given to King Kong, the Academy declined. The film placed in six American Film Institute (AFI) lists, including slots in the top 50 of AFI 100 Years 100 Movies list (original and 10th Anniversary Edition). Also ranked #4 in AFI's 10 Top 10 Fantasy films. Big winner that year, Cavalcade.
Despite what by today's standards are primitive special effects, they were ground-breaking at the time. King Kong in short is a thrill ride that still works for me today as it did for audiences in the 1930s.
Despite what by today's standards are primitive special effects, they were ground-breaking at the time. King Kong in short is a thrill ride that still works for me today as it did for audiences in the 1930s.
- Honorable mention: I chose Die Hard (1988) mostly because it is the quintessential modern action movie. Solid story, clever dialog, and great action. Bruce Willis was perfect in his role as a New York cop who's just trying to deal with his wife's new career when he gets stuck in a high rise with a bunch of "terrorists." Alan Rickman makes an an awesome villain, smart, cultured, yet deadly when it serves him. Nominated for
- Best Sound - Lost to Bird
- Best Film Editing - Lost to Who Framed Roger Rabbit
- Best Effects, Sound Effects Editing - Lost to Who Framed Roger Rabbit
- Best Effects, Visual Effects - Lost to Who Framed Roger Rabbit
White Heat (1949) received one Oscar nomination for Best Writing, Motion Picture Story; didn't win. That year, it was nominated for an Edgar (Mystery Writers of America) for Best Motion Picture and #4 in the AFI's 10 Top 10 Gangster films. Big winner that year, All the King's Men.
For me, this is James Cagney's best film. The Crime genre evolved in the 1930s as Gangster movies and here James Cagney raises the bar. Cagney's Cody Jarrett character is a smart but vicious criminal who suffers from debilitating headaches and is often soothed by his elderly mother. The mother's a bit of a psycho too, but he's good to her, and you have to respect that.
For me, this is James Cagney's best film. The Crime genre evolved in the 1930s as Gangster movies and here James Cagney raises the bar. Cagney's Cody Jarrett character is a smart but vicious criminal who suffers from debilitating headaches and is often soothed by his elderly mother. The mother's a bit of a psycho too, but he's good to her, and you have to respect that.
- Honorable mention: Heat (1995) is the type of film that Academy Awards would normally like. At close to 3 hours, it's epic in scale, and the acting performances in parts both big and small were great. Starring two of the best actors of their generation, Al Pacino and Robert De Niro, it's a wonder this film did not get a single Oscar nomination. By the mid-1990s, the Academy was more likely to take Crime films seriously, though it probably didn't help that it was directed by Micheal Mann, best known for the Miami Vice TV series. Big winner that year, Braveheart.
Double Indemnity (1944) received seven, count 'em, seven Oscar nominations (Best Picture, Best Actress in a Leading Role, Best Director, Best Writing, Screenplay, Best Cinematography, Black-and-White, Best Sound, Recording, and Best Music, Scoring of a Dramatic or Comedy Picture); didn't win any. Double Indemnity is kind of a snub within a snub. Edward G. Robinson gave what I thought was the performance of his career, and wasn't even nominated and never won nor was even nominated for a competitive Oscar. Robinson's competition that year was, Barry Fitzgerald (won for Going My Way), Hume Cronyn, Claude Rains, Clifton Webb, and Monty Woolley. The film placed in five separate AFI lists, including slots in the top 40 of AFI 100 Years 100 Movies list (original and 10th Anniversary Edition). Big winner that year, Going My Way.
On a related note, while both Double Indemnity and Gaslight were both nominated seven times that year, Going My Way was nominated 10 times and ended up winning seven. At the 17th Academy Awards ceremony, Billy Wilder (director of Double Indemnity) who was expecting to take home the lion's share of the awards that night sat by and watched as Going My Way took award after award. By the end of the night, it appeared that Going My Way was going to more or less sweep the awards. When they announced the award for Best Director, Billy Wilder who was sitting near the aisle tripped Leo McCarey (Going My Way) as he walked passed. McCarey noticeably stumbled as he walked up to accept his award.
As much as I love, Going My Way, it's sentimental hogwash compared to Double Indemnity. Yes, I know the War was on and people were looking for something uplifting, but still Going My Way not nearly the picture that either Gaslight or Double Indemnity are. I would have tripped McCarey myself.
As much as I love, Going My Way, it's sentimental hogwash compared to Double Indemnity. Yes, I know the War was on and people were looking for something uplifting, but still Going My Way not nearly the picture that either Gaslight or Double Indemnity are. I would have tripped McCarey myself.
- Honorable mention: The Maltese Falcon (1941) was nominated to for three Oscars; didn't win any. This is the movie that turned Humphrey Bogart from a character actor, who specialized in playing thugs, into an A list star. This is one of those films that if someone asked why you spent so much time watching old movies, you'd let them borrow, The Maltese Falcon. If they didn't get it, they would never understand. The big winner that year was, How Green Was My Valley, snagging five of the 11 it was nominated for. The Maltese Falcon was nominated three times:
- Best Picture – Lost to How Green Was My Valley
- Best Supporting Actor (Sydney Greenstreet) – Lost to How Green Was My Valley (Donald Crisp)
- Best Adapted Screenplay – Lost to Here Comes Mr. Jordan
Frankenstein (1931) received no Oscar nominations. Obviously, the Academy was very young at the time, so it seems unlikely that they'd find any way to nominate a film like Frankenstein. Still, the film has endured the test of time and ranked No. 87 in the first AFI 100 Years... 100 Movies list (though it was removed from the 10 anniversary update). The film was also ranked No. 56 on AFI's 100 Years... 100 Thrills list and nominated several times for other AFI lists. Really was no big winner that year. Two films won two awards Bad Girl and The Champ, and Best Picture went to Grand Hotel. There was a tie in the Best Actor category Wallace Beary for The Champ and Frederick March for Dr. Jeckyll and Mr. Hyde. So much for Horror films not getting Oscars.
I'm not a big Horror movie person. I chose Frankenstein because it is one of those films that is sort of etched into our collective psyche. It created the mythology of what a Horror film was all about. Even The New York Times called Dracula which came out earlier that same year tame in comparison to Frankenstein.
I'm not a big Horror movie person. I chose Frankenstein because it is one of those films that is sort of etched into our collective psyche. It created the mythology of what a Horror film was all about. Even The New York Times called Dracula which came out earlier that same year tame in comparison to Frankenstein.
- Honorable mention: Psycho (1960) appears on numerous top lists including slots in the top 20, AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies (both original and 10th anniversary) lists and No. 1 on their 100 Years...100 Thrills list. To this day, I still find the shower scene the most brutal sequence ever put on film. The fact that the main character gets killed about halfway through movie makes it all the more disturbing, leaving the audience at a a loss for what the film is now going to be about. The big winner that year was The Apartment. Psycho was nominated four times:
- Best Actress in a Supporting Role (Janet Leigh) – Lost to Elmer Gantry (Shirley Jones)
- Best Director – Lost to The Apartment
- Best Cinematography, Black-and-White – Lost to Sons and Lovers
- Best Art Direction-Set Decoration, Black-and-White – Lost to The Apartment
- Rebecca (1941) – Lost to John Ford, The Grapes of Wrath
- Lifeboat (1945) – Lost to Leo McCarey, Going My Way
- Spellbound (1946) – Lost to Billy Wilder, The Lost Weekend
- Rear Window (1955) – Lost to Elia Kazan, On the Waterfront
- Psycho (1961) – Lost to Billy Wilder, The Apartment
Rebecca did win Best Picture, but Best Picture is presented to the producer, not the director, so the Oscar for Rebecca went to David O. Selznick, not to Alfred Hitchcock.
North by Northwest is my personal favorite Hitchcock film. It appeared as No. 40 on AFI 100 Years 100 Movies list (No. 55 in the 10th Anniversary Edition) and was No. 7 on the AFI 10 Top 10 Mystery films. Big winner that year was Ben Hur winning 11 awards, including two that North by Northwest was nominated for. The third that North by Northwest was nominated for (Best Writing, Story and Screenplay) went to Pillow Talk. Now, I love Pillow Talk, great movie, but better story than North by Northwest? I feel like throwing myself off Mount Rushmore.
- Honorable mention: The Night of the Hunter (1955) received no Oscar nominations. I had a very tough time coming up with an Honorable Mention in this genre mostly because whenever I think Mystery/Suspense movies, the films of Alfred Hitchcock tend to blot out everything else. The Night of the Hunter was not considered a success when it was first released and only truly found an audience years after its release. Though looking at the film now, you could easily see Robert Mitchum and Lillian Gish being nominated in their respective acting categories, despite tough competition that year especially for Mitchum. Also, it was also Charles Laughton's only film as a director, yet David Lynch, Martin Scorsese, Terrence Malick, Jim Jarmusch, Spike Lee, and the Coen brothers all site it as an influence on their work. The Night of the Hunter appears as No. 34 on AFI's 100 Years... 100 Thrills list.
Blade Runner (1982) received two Oscar nominations for Best Art Direction-Set Decoration, lost to Gandhi, and Best Effects, Visual Effects, lost to E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial. Blade Runner appeared on the AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies list and was No. 6 on the AFI's Top 10 Sci-Fi Films of All Time, as well as numerous other top lists. Big winner that year was Gandhi.
I think that one of the problems with Blade Runner was that it had the misfortune of being released the same year as E.T. Science Fiction in particular is a genre that is relegated to certain categories. The Motion Picture Academy has only so many bones to throw, and to carry through with the metaphor, E.T. was a much bigger dog that year. For me, I actually think that Blade Runner is a bit short on story, but it is such a visually stunning film. I could run it on a continuous loop and never tire of it.
I think that one of the problems with Blade Runner was that it had the misfortune of being released the same year as E.T. Science Fiction in particular is a genre that is relegated to certain categories. The Motion Picture Academy has only so many bones to throw, and to carry through with the metaphor, E.T. was a much bigger dog that year. For me, I actually think that Blade Runner is a bit short on story, but it is such a visually stunning film. I could run it on a continuous loop and never tire of it.
- Honorable mention: 12 Monkeys (1995) was nominated for two Oscars; didn't win any. I personally think it is a much better film than Blade Runner. I went this way mostly because I wanted to keep this grounded in classic film, hence Blade Runner over a film I think is much better. In particular, Brad Pitt's performance was brilliant. It's what made me sit and notice that Brad Pitt was not just at pretty face, he could really act. Also, I could easily see Terry Gilliam being nominated if not winning as best director. Big winner that year, Braveheart. 12 Monkeys was nominated in two categories:
- Best Actor in a Supporting Role (Brad Pitt) – Lost to The Usual Suspects (Kevin Spacey)
- Best Costume Design – Lost to Restoration
The Searchers (1956) received no Oscar nominations. The Searchers appeared as No. 96 on the AFI's 100 Years... 100 Movies and No. 12 10th Anniversary Edition of the same list and was No. 1 on their 10 Top 10 Westerns list. Big winners that year were Around the World in 80 Days and The King and I, both with five wins.
I'm kind of at a loss here. My opinion is that this is easily John Wayne's best performance. The cinematography was beautiful. It's a very good story, not just standard Western shoot-em up. There were some very good films nominated that year, but only a handful that could stand up to The Searchers.
This post is part of the 31 Days of Oscar Blogathon 2015 hosted by Paula's Cinema Club, Outspoken and Freckled and Once Upon a Screen, Thanks Paula, Kellee, and Aurora for all of your hard work.
I'm kind of at a loss here. My opinion is that this is easily John Wayne's best performance. The cinematography was beautiful. It's a very good story, not just standard Western shoot-em up. There were some very good films nominated that year, but only a handful that could stand up to The Searchers.
- Honorable mention: Red River (1948) was nominated for two oscars; didn't win any. Both Montgomery Clift and John Wayne both turned great performances. I have to say I think that John Wayne was better in The Searchers, but I think Red River showed the world that John Wayne could act. The big winner that year was Hamlet. Red River was nominated twice:
- Best Film Editing – Lost to The Naked City
- Best Writing, Motion Picture Story – Lost to The Search
This post is part of the 31 Days of Oscar Blogathon 2015 hosted by Paula's Cinema Club, Outspoken and Freckled and Once Upon a Screen, Thanks Paula, Kellee, and Aurora for all of your hard work.
DAMN great list from the gut, Chris! Every single film snub you mention sticks in my craw! Unbelievable! Fun read. Thanks so much for taking part in the blogathon! And for the record, I like Wayne much more in Red River than in The Searchers.
ReplyDeleteAurora
Aurora, He's kind of dickish in both, but I can see that.
ReplyDeleteChris
I think a great many directors, writers, cinematographers, composers and actors did some of their best work in westerns, yet the nominations and wins are so few that they stick out like a sore thumb. Consider Ford, A. Mann, Hawks, Chase, Nugent, Alton, Joseph MacDonald, Newman, Fonda, Stewart, Wayne.
ReplyDeleteSometimes I get the feeling that the folks at the Academy don't really like movies.